A “Gun Free School Zone” case has been appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The appeal attacks the Gun Free School Zone Act (GFSZA) as being an unconstitutional infringement of rights protected by the Second Amendment. An amicus brief has been filed by the California Rifle and Pistol Association (CRPA), the Second Amendment Law Center, and the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF).
From January 5th to the 29th of 2023, Ahmed Allam spent several hours in the afternoon and evening parked across the street from a parochial school, St. Anthony Cathedral Basilica School in Beaumont, Texas. Police were called nine times. On January 25, police warned Mr. Allam that the plastic frame around his license plate was obscuring the state of registration, a violation. On Sunday evening, January 29, 2023, Mr. Allam was parked across from the school from 4:00 P.M. to about 9:05 P.M. when he started to drive away from the school. A police officer followed him and pulled him over for failing to signal a turn. He refused to talk to the police and was arrested for the license plate violation.
The car was searched. An AR-15 rifle, two 50-round boxes of ammunition, and a 30-round magazine were found.
A grand jury charged Mr. Allam with a single count of violating the Gun Free School Zone Act. Mr. Allam challenged the law on an “as applied” basis, claiming the GFSZA violated the Second Amendment. The district court judge, Marcia A. Crone, found the Gun Free School Zone Act was Constitutional. Mr. Allam pleaded guilty without a plea deal and was sentenced to 5 years in prison on January 30, 2024. Mr. Allam submitted a timely appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on February 1, 2024.
The amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief for the CRPA, the Second Amendment Law Center, and the SAF was filed on July 19, 2024.
In the Allam case, Judge Crone relied on similar arguments put forward in the Montana GFSZA case in Billings. She made the claim that buffer zones around polling places on election day were close enough to permanent 1,000-foot zones around schools as a reasonable analogy. As the defense and the Amicus brief explain, this analogy does not work to overcome the restraints of the Second Amendment. From the amicus brief:
Third, even if the exceedingly few 19th-century polling place buffer zone laws the district court cited were deemed sufficient in number to be valid historical analogues, they are not relevantly similar to the school zone restriction of §922(q)(2)(A) in terms of the burden they impose. The polling place buffer zones would only apply on election days, totaling no more than two-to-three days in a given year depending on how many federal, state, local, and primary elections occurred. By contrast, the school zone laws apply all day long, every day of the year, regardless of the presence of children or staff, including when school is not in session and the school year is over.
The Montana Gun Free School Zone Act case has a sentencing hearing scheduled for August 2, 2024. The Montana case started on August 23, 2023, about seven months after Mr. Allam was arrested in Beaumont, Texas. A plea deal was agreed to. An appeal will not be filed until after the sentencing hearing. The Fifth Circuit, which serves Texas, is considered to be much more considerate of rights protected by the Second Amendment than is the Ninth Circuit, which has jurisdiction in the Billings, Montana case.
It is likely that one or both of the appeals will find the GFSZA unconstitutional. Circuit Court appeals tend to take time. Book-long briefs are filed in constitutional cases. Decisions and dissents are often over 100 pages long. The results of the appeal in the Texas case and the appeal in the Montana case will not be known before the end of 2024.
About Dean Weingarten:
Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of Constitutional Carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.
the gfsza is patently unconstitutional, a violation of the Second Amendment and freedom in general. the analogy by the “judge” in this case is non-sensical at best, as there is no buffer zone at a polling place, you just cannot bring in into the polling place. the arbitrary and ambiguous language used to write and enforce this piece of crap is beyond belief.
I’ll assume you are referring to Texas law since the buffer zone at polling places is controlled by State law. In Missouri permit holders are not authorized to carry “Within twenty-five feet of any polling place on any election day. Possession of a firearm in a vehicle on the premises of the polling place shall not be a criminal offense so long as the firearm is not removed from the vehicle or brandished while the vehicle is on the premises;” and it is specifically unlawful to “Carries a firearm or any other weapon readily capable of lethal use into any… Read more »
I’d like to know why this guy was parked across the street from a school for long periods of time. It sounds a bit creepy. The last thing we need is another Rahimi.
I wish we could have a Decorated Veteran, picking up his grandson from baseball practice, as the appellate in one of these cases. Sigh…
Problem with GFZ is the mis-nomer as Gun Free Zones, when they are actually “Fish On A Barrel Zones.” Correctly name them…truth in advertising.
Once again. politicians with laws never stop bad guys with guns, evil intent. They only control the good guys, which is their true intent.
Every square inch or none at all…
Remember, the GFSZA was declared unconstitutional in US v Lopez, back in 1995. Congress changed a few words and repassed it in 1995, but it’s always been constitutionally suspect.